Seite 1 von 1

LCIE Wolfsmanagement-Plan

Verfasst: Fr 16. Mär 2018, 13:48
von Manfred
Der LCIE Wolfsmanagement-Plan aus dem Jahr 2000.

http://www.kora.ch/malme/05_library/5_1 ... Europe.pdf

Da stehen eine Menge interessanter Sachen drin, aus denen das deutsche Wolfsmanagement bisher offensichtlich nichts gelernt hat.


Seite 21:
Die Schädlichkeit eines Zuständigkeits-Chaos diverser Behörden / Organisationen, das konsequent schnelle und pragmatische Lösungen verhindert:

"Fragmented legislation is often implemented by an even greater fragmentation of management authorities: in many European countries the Forestry Service, Game Boards, Regional or Provincial Boards, various ministries, as well as the Veterinary Services all have a say in wolf management. This fragmentation makes any real implementation of a national plan very difficult and will have to be overcome. Moreover, many offices that are in charge of some aspect of management are technically unsuited or not trained for the job."


Seite 22:
Es wird beschrieben, wie schädlich es ist, dass einige Organisationen den Wolf zum armen Opfer hochstilisieren und dass sich das Wolfsmanagement stattdessen auf saubere wissenschaftliche Informationen stützten sollte:

"Several conservation organisations have wrongly decided that conservation can be achieved by selling the wolf as an innocent victim of human ferocity. This opposite image does as much harm to rational wolf conservation as the bad image built on traditional folklore. Public opinion management will have to be based on a sound understanding of the attitudes of various social and economic segments of the population."


Seite 25:
Unten auf der Seite das auch von mir immer wieder vorgeschlagene und im schwedischen Management umgesetzte Kernzonenmodell beschrieben:

"This Management Plan will provide indications to mitigate the conflict and it will include the identification of a zoning system for wolf management; a core area and a surrounding buffer area will presumably be reserved for different level of wolf management and conservation actions. Outside these areas, the wolf will be removed when no other satisfying management policy can be implemented (article 16 of the Habitat Directive). This approach should allow for effective conservation of viable wolf populations even within multiple-use areas. Zoning would be used to calibrate a flexible management system which will react with different measures depending on the level of livestock depredation, public attitudes, and other economic activities."


Seite 31:
Ein Bestand von 100 Tieren (davon 15 an der Reproduktion beteiligte Paare) könnte für den Erhalt einer isolierten Population ausreichend sein.

"Therefore, although there are no definitive studies or tests of how small a completely isolated population of wolves could be and still survive for a long period, wolf experts suggest that as few as 15 breeding pairs (perhaps 100 wolves) might suffice."

Seite 32:
Ein isolierter Bestand von 100 Tieren (davon 10 bis 12 reproduzierende Paare) oder entsprechend weniger, falls genetischer Austausch besteht, kann als erholt angesehen werden, vorausgesetzt, dass ausreichend Beutetiere zu ihrer Ernährung verfügbar sind.

"If a population has reached at least 100 individuals (about 10-12 breeding pairs), or less if “connected”, and if it is clear that prey abundance could support that number, that particular population can be considered recovered.